Process and Simulation“We act as a service provider for the entire company”

Our colleagues in the Process and Simulation team already know how well new components will work in our machines even before prototypes are available. They also supply the right process to match the machine. We reveal how this works.

Wolfang Krahl and his colleagues already know how certain compo­nents will work on the Uhlmann machines before they even exist. They may not have a crystal ball, but they do have another pretty powerful tool to work with; it’s called simu­la­tion. They also perform tests on the machine to ensure that the process is opti­mally matched to the equip­ment. Three simu­la­tion engi­neers and five process engi­neers work together in the Process and Simu­la­tion team – along with Wolfang Krahl, the team leader.

Krahl himself is a simu­la­tion engi­neer and has been with Uhlmann since September 2000. “Three years ago, the two teams of Process Tech­nology and Simu­la­tion were merged. This makes sense, as we can also use simu­la­tion models to check process tech­nology issues,” explains Krahl. “We model hypotheses about how a process works in the simu­la­tion and compare them with the hard test on the machine, and then we can see whether it really does work as intended.” While one part of the team mainly works on the PC in the office, the other is usually running tests on the actual machine.

Thanks to their simu­la­tions, Peter Born (left) and Wolf­gang Krahl already know what the optimum machine part looks like before a proto­type is produced.

“The Process and Simu­la­tion team acts as a service provider for the entire company, so the inter­faces with other depart­ments are corre­spond­ingly diverse. Wolf­gang Krahl explains: “Our job includes working on devel­op­ment or design projects, but we also come into play when it comes to preparing a quote for a concept where the func­tions need to be analyzed in more detail in advance.”

A good simu­la­tion yields big savings

The tech­nical term for this approach is ‘front­loading’. The aim is to carry out as much devel­op­ment work and func­tional veri­fi­ca­tion as possible right at the begin­ning of a project, even before a proto­type is built. Krahl explains: “With our methods, we eval­uate the concept in advance, without a real compo­nent. This saves time and money – and is the main objec­tive of simu­la­tion.” This often involves analyzing move­ments. “We have a high degree of automa­tion in our machines. Conse­quently, we have multiple work motion sequences that need to be synchro­nized and aligned with each other,” says Krahl. The engi­neers simu­late motion plans, look for optimal move­ment patterns, and design the processes so that they work effi­ciently. “We can already calcu­late many elements very precisely, like how high the dynamic load on the parts is and how we can design the drives.” This requires exten­sive tech­nical exper­tise. The simu­la­tion team is there­fore made up of devel­op­ment engi­neers, most of whom have a degree in mechan­ical engi­neering and have then gone on to specialize in calcu­la­tion methods.

With our methods, we eval­uate the concept in advance, without a real compo­nent. This saves time and money.

Wolf­gang Krahl, Team Leader Process and Simu­la­tion

Reality check on the machine

Our process engi­neers in the team are more hands-on. They check and opti­mize the processes on our machines. Krahl gives an example: “We have a sealing process in our blister machines in which two films are bonded together. This is a very complex process that places high demands on the design.” What’s chal­lenging about it is that different plastic films are used in various combi­na­tions, and each mate­rial behaves differ­ently on the machine. This makes the process highly vari­able and diffi­cult to calcu­late. “The process engi­neers tackle precisely these kinds of issues,” says Krahl. “They run lots of machine tests, check the process and the process window for different combi­na­tions.”

With an eye for detail: Jörg Knüppel (left) and Christoph Glaser check how the foil behaves during sealing.

Peter Gellerich and his colleagues often break new scien­tific ground with their exper­i­ments.

In addi­tion to the tests on the machine, knowl­edge transfer is an impor­tant task for the process engi­neers.

Their aim is to make the process window as large as possible. In other words, the range in which the machine reli­ably turns out good prod­ucts. Because the larger the window, the more stable the systems work. “Our process engi­neers are often working in fields that are very diffi­cult to describe using simu­la­tions; it is, in fact, very diffi­cult to calcu­late in theory how a plastic film will actu­ally behave in reality,” empha­sizes Krahl. Building up process knowl­edge is an essen­tial task of process tech­nology. “To stay with the example of the sealing station,” says Krahl: “Should Uhlmann develop a new sealing station at some point, then the process tech­nology will provide certain require­ments for it, which they have deter­mined in their previous tests. These then ensure that a new, robust assembly can be created.”

Our process engi­neers often work in fields that are very diffi­cult to describe using simu­la­tions.

Wolf­gang Krahl, Team Leader Process and Simu­la­tion

The secret’s in the mix

For Wolf­gang Krahl, it’s the wide variety of tasks that make his work so appealing. “There is no routine. Building up knowl­edge about modeling, front­loading or under­standing processes is natu­rally always very chal­lenging. But that’s exactly what I like about it.” The simu­la­tion team, in partic­ular, often has to jump from one topic to the next when urgent jobs arise. Expe­ri­enced and younger colleagues there­fore solve the tasks hand in hand. Everyone bene­fits. Trans­parency, open­ness and reli­a­bility are there­fore espe­cially impor­tant to Krahl in his depart­ment. “And a high sense of respon­si­bility,” he adds. “Nobody ques­tions our results after­wards. If we don’t do our job prop­erly, it won’t work in the end. We always have to be aware of that.”

Here, our simu­la­tion and process engi­neers reveal what makes their job so special:

Peter Born, Simu­la­tion Engi­neer, part of the team since September 2020

You act as an internal service provider for the entire Uhlmann Group, what exactly are your tasks in the Simu­la­tion team?

We mainly work with designers, but also with program­mers. Ideally, we are involved in devel­op­ment projects when it comes to devel­oping new machines or func­tional assem­blies. We support the designers with simu­la­tive activ­i­ties and calcu­la­tions. Usually, we are asked to address a specific issue, like can my compo­nents with­stand the load?

So, that means you always consult with the rele­vant depart­ment during a project, right? 

Yes, exactly. For example, if we iden­tify a short­coming in the design, the simu­la­tion gives us the oppor­tu­nity to propose ways to opti­mize it. We then submit our sugges­tions to the design depart­ment who then check whether they are feasible. This allows us to quickly test multiple vari­ants on the computer. If you always had to use real parts on the machine to do this, it would require a lot more time and effort. At the same time, it is also impor­tant for us to find out how well the results from the simu­la­tion match the expe­ri­ence gained in the real test. In other words, both in the event that there is a devi­a­tion, and in the event that it works exactly as predicted. Some­times this gets lost in the hectic of the commis­sioning phase. However, it’s extremely impor­tant to get this feed­back so that we can constantly improve our models and provide even more accu­rate state­ments for future simu­la­tions.

What skills does it take to do the job?

In this job you need to work very accu­rately and respon­sibly. It also requires good analyt­ical skills, and you need to know how your assembly or machine works and what you’re aiming to achieve.  Finally, you have to abstract all this infor­ma­tion and break down the func­tions of the machine into formulas and phys­ical quan­ti­ties. It’s defi­nitely some­thing you want to enjoy doing. You then have to commu­ni­cate the results effec­tively to the devel­op­ment team.

The will­ing­ness to try new things is also impor­tant. We rarely stick to the same proce­dure when we do calcu­la­tions as we are constantly faced with new chal­lenges. Being based here in the devel­op­ment depart­ment means that there will always be new func­tions that we have never imple­mented before.

Peter Gellerich, process engi­neer, part of the team since January 2023

What does your job as a process engi­neer entail?

In process engi­neering, our job is all about under­standing the phys­ical and tech­nical processes that take place in our machines. We try to find out the causes of certain effects and then derive tech­nical require­ments from them. This enables us to improve our machines, initiate new devel­op­ments, resolve customer issues, and support our colleagues in commis­sioning. Our work is very scien­tific in nature. Sealing large surfaces is quite a niche topic, and we are breaking new scien­tific ground, here. We have little to fall back on and have to do a lot of basic research.

Does that mean you spend a lot of time working on the machine and running tests?

That’s right.  Only recently, for example, we received an inquiry from a customer who wanted to run a new product with a special film that has a very thick paper layer on the inside. Our job was to work out how we could get the temper­a­ture through this cover film from the outside in order to connect both sides. In cases like these we run appro­priate tests.

Are the para­me­ters that you deter­mine in your tests subse­quently incor­po­rated in the simu­la­tion?

Yes, exactly! We are closely inter­linked here. Our colleagues in simu­la­tion can map the phys­ical rela­tion­ships and check whether they are basi­cally correct. However, you will always have certain values that cannot be deter­mined precisely in this way. We have to iden­tify these para­me­ters exper­i­men­tally and the simu­la­tion then uses them to enhance its models. During the vali­da­tion process, we then check whether the results fit. Modeling is always an inter­play between simu­la­tion and exper­i­ment.

What do you partic­u­larly like about your job?

I like the fact that it gives me the oppor­tu­nity to really immerse myself in the details, to work scien­tif­i­cally, and to help colleagues with very specific prob­lems by conducting basic research. This allows us to offer real added value, and it’s just plain fun when you can explain the results to the teams in the other depart­ments and they then say: Now I get it! It’s the same when working with customers. I like the inter­me­diary role we play inter­nally and exter­nally.

What qual­i­ties do you defi­nitely need as a process engi­neer?

You really need to be curious and keen to get to the bottom of things. You shouldn’t be satis­fied with quick expla­na­tions, but always ques­tion them. You also need to work method­i­cally and occa­sion­ally stick with some­thing a little longer. Some­times it takes many attempts, which is why you need perse­ver­ance. And you shouldn’t be afraid to embrace compli­cated methods – they are inte­gral to your work and can be mastered. It also helps if you can approach people and are good at commu­ni­cating the facts to them. Other­wise, the knowl­edge won’t be passed on.

Read more: All Articles